Victims’ Views and Concerns on the Issue of Reparation or Assistance in Lieu of Reparation Pursuant to the Trial Chamber Decision of 5 April 2016 on the Defence Motions on ‘No Case to Answer’

ICC-01/09-01/11-2035

15 June 2016 | Legal Representatives of Victims | Submission

Affaire: The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
Situation: Situation in the Republic of Kenya

Classé au cours de la Trial phase

Annexes

ICC-01/09-01/11-2035-Anx1, Annex 1 to the Victims’ Views and Concerns on the Issue of Reparation or Assistance in Lieu of Reparation Pursuant to the Trial Chamber Decision of 5 April 2016 on the Defence Motions on ‘No Case to Answer’
English (530.43 Ko | 6 Pages)

ICC-01/09-01/11-2035-Anx2, Annex 2 to the Victims’ Views and Concerns on the Issue of Reparation or Assistance in Lieu of Reparation Pursuant to the Trial Chamber Decision of 5 April 2016 on the Defence Motions on ‘No Case to Answer’
English (311.42 Ko | 7 Pages)

ICC-01/09-01/11-2035-Anx3, Annex 3 to the Victims’ Views and Concerns on the Issue of Reparation or Assistance in Lieu of Reparation Pursuant to the Trial Chamber Decision of 5 April 2016 on the Defence Motions on ‘No Case to Answer’
English (866.36 Ko | 5 Pages)

Documents Connexes

1 juillet 2016, Decision on the Requests regarding Reparations (2.26 Mo | 6 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-2038 | Trial Chamber V(a)