Utilisez un ou plusieurs des filtres situés dans le menu latéral gauche pour affiner votre recherche

Type de document

Source du document

Phase de l’affaire

Appel interlocutoire (sélectionnez d'abord l’affaire)

Documents publics

Response to the appeal of the Prosecutor against the decision of Pre-Trail Chamber II entitled "Decision pursuant to article 18(2) of the Statute authorising the Prosecution to resume investigation" of 31 October 2022 (ICC-02/17-196)
Situation en République islamique d'Afghanistan
  • Réponse
  • Autres participants
  • ICC-02/17-203
Response to ‘Prosecution appeal of “Decision pursuant to article 18(2) of the Statute authorising the Prosecution to resume investigation” (ICC-02/17-196)’
Situation en République islamique d'Afghanistan
  • Réponse
  • Autres participants
  • ICC-02/17-204
Victims’ Response to “Prosecution appeal of “Decision pursuant to article 18(2) of the Statute authorising the Prosecution to resume investigation” (ICC-02/17-196)” (ICC-02/17-198)
Situation en République islamique d'Afghanistan
  • Réponse
  • Autres participants
  • ICC-02/17-201
Prosecution Response to “Mémoire d’appel de trois décisions”
Le Procureur c. Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman ("Ali Kushayb")
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-02/05-01/20-162
Corrected version of “Response to ‘Former child soldiers’ observations on the Appeal from the Second decision on the Defence’s challenge to the jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9’, ICC-01/04-02/06-1798”, 1 March 2017, ICC-01/04-02-181
Le Procureur c. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Réponse
  • Défense : Ntaganda
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1810-Corr
Response to “Former child soldiers’ observations on the Appeal from the Second decision on the Defence’s challenge to the jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9”, ICC-01/04-02/06-1798
Le Procureur c. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Réponse
  • Défense : Ntaganda
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1810
Prosecution Response to Mr Ntaganda’s request for leave to reply supporting his ‘Appeal from the Second Decision on the Defence’s Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9’ (ICC-01/04-02/06-1800)
Le Procureur c. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1804
Corrected version of “Prosecution’s Response to Ntaganda’s ‘Appeal from the Second Decision on the Defence’s Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9’”, 17 February 2017, ICC-01/04-02/06-1794
Le Procureur c. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1794-Corr
Prosecution’s Response to Ntaganda’s “Appeal from the Second Decision on the Defence’s Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9”??
Le Procureur c. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1794
Former Child Soldiers’ response to the “Application on behalf of Mr Ntaganda for variation of time limit for the filing of the document in support of the Appeal”
Le Procureur c. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du conseil public pour les victimes
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1735
Prosecution’s response to Mr Ntaganda’s application for variation of time limit for the filing of the document in support of the Appeal?
Le Procureur c. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1734
The Government of the Republic of Kenya’s Response to the ‘Amicus Curiae Observations of the Africa Centre for Open Governance pursuant to Rule 103 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence’
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Réponse
  • Représentants des États
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1030
Victims’ response to the Amicus Curiae Observations of the Africa Centre for Open Governance
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Réponse
  • Représentants légaux des victimes
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1026
Prosecution response to the Government of Kenya’s request for extension of time to file its response to the “amicus curiae observations of the Africa Centre for Open Governance pursuant to Rule 103 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence”
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1027
Response of the Government of the Republic of Kenya to 'Corrected version of Victims' submissions on the Prosecutor's appeal against the "Decision on Prosecution's application for a finding of non-compliance under Article 87(7) of the Statute'
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Réponse
  • Représentants des États
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1024
Response of the Government of the Republic of Kenya to ‘Victims’ request to participate in the Prosecutor’s appeal against the “Decision on Prosecution’s application for a finding of non‑compliance under Article 87 (7) of the Statute”
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Réponse
  • Représentants des États
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1014
Response of the Government of the Republic of Kenya to 'Prosecution appeal against the "Decision on Prosecution's application for a finding of non-compliance under Article 87 (7) of the Statute"
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Réponse
  • Représentants des États
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1013
Prosecution Response to Victims’ request to participate in the Prosecutor’s appeal against the “Decision on Prosecution’s application for a finding of non-compliance under Article 87(7) of the Statute”
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1012
Public redacted version of “Prosecution’s response to Mr Banda’s appeal against the decision issuing a warrant of arrest”, 23 January 2015, ICC-02/05-03/09-629-Conf-Exp
Le Procureur c. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-02/05-03/09-629-Red
Prosecution’s Response to “Defence Request for extension of time to submit Document in Support of Appeal”
Le Procureur c. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-02/05-03/09-622
About 53 results