Utilisez un ou plusieurs des filtres situés dans le menu latéral gauche pour affiner votre recherche

Type de document

Type de Décision

Source du document

Phase de l’affaire

Appel interlocutoire (sélectionnez d'abord l’affaire)

Documents publics

Decision on the appeal of Mr Francis Kirimi Muthaura and Mr Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta against the decision of Pre-Trial Chamber II of 23 January 2012 entitled "Decision on the Confirmation of Charges Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute"
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Décision
  • Chambre d’appel
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-425
Decision on the "Request to Make Oral Submissions on Jurisdiction under Rule 156(3)"
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Décision
  • Chambre d’appel
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-421
Request to Make Oral Submissions on Jurisdiction under Rule 156(3)
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura et Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Requête
  • Défense
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-418
Decision on the "Notification regarding the Legal Representation of Participating Victims in the Appeal Proceedings"
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Décision
  • Chambre d’appel
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-416
The Registrar's Observations on the "Notification regarding the Legal Representation of Participating Victims in these Appeals Proceedings" dated 19 March 2012
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura et Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Observations
  • Greffier
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-412
Order on the submission of observations by the Registrar on the "Notification regarding the Legal Representation of Participating Victims in these Appeals Proceedings"
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Décision
  • Chambre d’appel
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-413
Notification regarding the Legal Representation of Participating Victims in these Appeals Proceedings
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura et Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Avis
  • Représentants légaux des victimes
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-409
Prosecution’s Response to the Victims’ “Observations pursuant to Article 19(3) of the Rome Statute and Rule 59(3) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence” (ICC-01/09-02/11-408 OA4)
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura et Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-410
Observations pursuant to Article 19 (3) of the Rome Statute and Rule 59 (3) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura et Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Observations
  • Représentants légaux des victimes
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-408
Prosecution’s Response to “Document in Support of Appeal on behalf of Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta and Francis Kirimi Muthaura pursuant to Article 82(1)(a) against Jurisdiction in the ‘Decision on the Confirmation of Charges Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b)
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura et Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-404
Decision on the request of Mr Kenyatta and Mr Muthaura for suspensive effect
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Décision
  • Chambre d’appel
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-401
Decision on the "Observations on the 'Directions on the submission of observations pursuant to article 19 (3) of the Rome Statute and rule 59 (3) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence"'
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Décision
  • Chambre d’appel
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-400
Document in Support of Articles 19(6) and 82(1)(a) Appeal by the Defence for Mr. Sang on Jurisdiction
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto, Henry Kiprono Kosgey et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Transmission
  • Défense
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-389
Document in Support of Appeal on behalf of Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta and Francis Kirimi Muthaura pursuant to Article 82(1)(a) against Jurisdiction in the “Decision on the Confirmation of Charges Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute”
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta et Mohammed Hussein Ali
  • Appel
  • Défense
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-399
Prosecution’s Consolidated Response to Mr Muthaura’s and Mr Kenyatta’s Requests for Suspensive Effect of their Appeals on Jurisdiction (ICC-01/09-02/11-383 OA4 )
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta et Mohammed Hussein Ali
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-398
Response on behalf of Uhuru Kenyatta to the “Observations on the ‘Directions on the submission of observations pursuant to article 19(3) of the Rome Statute and rule 59(3) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence’”
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta et Mohammed Hussein Ali
  • Réponse
  • Défense
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-397
Observations on the “Directions on the submission of observations pursuant to article 19 (3) of the Rome Statute and rule 59 (3) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence”
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta et Mohammed Hussein Ali
  • Observations
  • Bureau du conseil public pour les victimes
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-395
Instructions relatives à la présentation d’observations en vertu de l’article 19-3 du Statut de Rome et de la règle 59-3 du Règlement de procédure et de preuve
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Décision
  • Chambre d’appel
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-394-tFRA
Directions on the submission of observations pursuant to article 19 (3) of the Rome Statute and rule 59 (3) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Décision
  • Chambre d’appel
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-394
Order on the filing of a response to request for suspensive effect
Le Procureur c. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Décision
  • Chambre d’appel
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-393
About 24 results