Utilisez un ou plusieurs des filtres situés dans le menu latéral gauche pour affiner votre recherche

Type de document

Source du document

Phase de l’affaire

Appel interlocutoire (sélectionnez d'abord l’affaire)

Documents publics

Prosecution’s Response to “Paul Gicheru’s Request for Suspensive Effect under Article 82(3) of the Rome Statute”
Le Procureur c. Paul Gicheru
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/20-95
Public Redacted Version of "Corrected Version of "Paul Gicheru's Response to OPCD Appeal against the Decision on Applicability of Provisional Rule 165," 21 January 2021, ICC-01/09-01/20/84-Conf", 1 February 2021, ICC-01/09-01/20-84-Conf-Corr
Le Procureur c. Paul Gicheru
  • Réponse
  • Défense : Gicheru
  • ICC-01/09-01/20-84-Corr-Red
Prosecution’s Response to OPCD’s “Request to Dismiss In Limine the Prosecution’s Arguments on Standing or, in the alternative, Leave to Reply”
Le Procureur c. Paul Gicheru
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/20-87
Prosecution’s Response to OPCD’s “Appeal[] against the Decision on Applicability of Provisional Rule 165”
Le Procureur c. Paul Gicheru
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/20-83
Paul Gicheru's Response to OPCD Request for an Extension of Time
Le Procureur c. Paul Gicheru
  • Réponse
  • Défense : Gicheru
  • ICC-01/09-01/20-71
Defence Response to the “Request for an Oral Hearing Pursuant to Rule 156 (3)”
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta et Mohammed Hussein Ali
  • Réponse
  • Défense
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-233
Prosecution’s Response to the Government of Kenya “Request for an Oral Hearing Pursuant to Rule 156(3)”
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto, Henry Kiprono Kosgey et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-253
Response to Government of Kenya's "Request for an Oral Hearing Pursuant to Rule 156(3)"
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta et Mohammed Hussein Ali
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du conseil public pour les victimes
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-228
Prosecution’s Response to the Government of Kenya “Request for an Oral Hearing Pursuant to Rule 156(3)”
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta et Mohammed Hussein Ali
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-232
Response to the Government of Kenya’s “Request for an Oral Hearing Pursuant to Rule 156(3)”
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto, Henry Kiprono Kosgey et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du conseil public pour les victimes
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-250
Response to Government of Kenya request for an Oral Hearing on Admissibility
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto, Henry Kiprono Kosgey et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Défense
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-251
Prosecution’s response to the “Victims Observations on the Government of Kenya’s Appeal Concerning Admissibility of Proceedings”
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta et Mohammed Hussein Ali
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-198
Prosecution's Response to the “Victims Observations on the Government of Kenya’s Appeal Concerning Admissibility of Proceedings”
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto, Henry Kiprono Kosgey et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-230
Response on behalf of the Government of Kenya to the “Victims Observations on the Government of Kenya’s Appeal Concerning Admissibility of Proceedings”
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta et Mohammed Hussein Ali
  • Réponse
  • Autres participants
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-194
Response to the Application on behalf of the Government of Kenya for Leave to Reply to the ‚Prosecution’s response to the ‘Appeal of the Government of Kenya against the Decision on the Application by the Government of Kenya Challenging the Admissibility
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto, Henry Kiprono Kosgey et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Défense
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-223
Response on behalf of the Government of Kenya to the “Victims Observations on the Government of Kenya’s Appeal Concerning Admissibility of Proceedings”
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto, Henry Kiprono Kosgey et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Autres participants
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-226
Prosecution’s response to the Application on behalf of the Government of Kenya for Leave to Reply to the “Prosecution’s response to the ‘Appeal of the Government of Kenya against the Decision on the Application by the Government of Kenya Challenging t
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto, Henry Kiprono Kosgey et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-217
Prosecution’s response to the Application on behalf of the Government of Kenya for Leave to Reply to the “Prosecution’s response to the ‘Appeal of the Government of Kenya against the Decision on the Application by the Government of Kenya Challenging t
Le Procureur c. Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta et Mohammed Hussein Ali
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-190
Prosecution’s Response to the “Appeal of the Government of Kenya against the `Decision on the Request for Assistance Submitted on Behalf of the Government of the Republic of Kenya Pursuant to Article 93(10) of the Statute and Rule 194 of the Rules of
Situation en République du Kenya
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-75
Ruto and Sang Defence Response to the Government of Kenya’s ‘Document in Support of the ‚Appeal of the Government of Kenya against the Decision on the Application by the Government of Kenya Challenging the Admissibility of the Case Pursuant to Article 18
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto, Henry Kiprono Kosgey et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Défense
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-185
About 23 results