Use one or more of the filters located in the left sidebar to narrow your search results

Document Type

Document Source

Phase of Case

Interlocutory Appeal

Court Records

Sang Defence Response to ‘Ruto defence request to appoint an amicus prosecutor’ ??
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2030
Sang Defence Submission in addition to Appeal against the decision of Trial Chamber V (A) of 19 August 2015 entitled
“Decision on Prosecution Request for Admission of Prior Recorded Testimony”
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Submission
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2006
Public Redacted Version of Sang Defence ‘No Case to Answer’ Motion,  filed on 23 October 2015
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Motion
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1991-Red
Sang Defence Response to the African Union’s Amicus Curiae Observations on the Rule 68 Amendments at the Twelfth Session of the Assembly of States Parties
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1993
Public Redacted Version of Sang Defence Appeal against the decision of Trial Chamber V (A) of 19 August 2015 entitled “Decision on Prosecution Request for Admission of Prior Recorded Testimony”
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Appeal
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1982-Red
Sang Defence Response to the Government of the Republic of Kenya’s Request for Leave pursuant to Rule 103 (1) to join as Amicus Curiae and make Observations in the Appeal, by the Ruto and Sang Defence Teams, of the ‘Decision on Prosecution Request for
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1979
Sang Defence Second Request for Reconsideration of Page Limit
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Request
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1963
Sang Defence Response to Ruto Defence application for extension of time limit to submit a ‘no case to answer’ motion
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1960
Sang Defence Request to Join the Addendum to the ‘Ruto Defence Request for Extension of Page and Time Limits’
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Request
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1958
Public Redacted Version of Confidential Sang Defence Request for Leave to Appeal the Decision on Prosecution Request for Admission of Prior Recorded Testimony
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Request
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1939-Red
Public Redacted Version of Sang Defence Response to Ruto Defence Request to Rule Inadmissible Certain Supporting Material Relied upon in the ‘Prosecution’s Request for the Admission of Prior‑Recorded Testimony of [REDACTED] Witnesses’ and to Order the Pr
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1875-Red
Public Redacted Version of Sang Defence Response to Prosecution’s Second Application for Admission of Items from Bar Table into Evidence, 10 July 2015, ICC-01/09-01/11-1927-Conf
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1927-Red
Public Redacted Version of Sang Defence Observations on Admissibility of Prosecution Interview with [REDACTED],  ICC‑01/09‑01/11‑1534‑Conf
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Observations
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1534-Red
Public Redacted Version of Corrigendum to Sang Defence Response to Prosecution’s Request for the Admission of Prior Recorded Testimony of Six Witnesses, filed on 12 June 2015
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1911-Corr-Red
About 14 results