Decision on Page and Time Limits for the 'No Case to Answer' Motion

ICC-01/09-01/11-1970

18 September 2015 | Trial Chamber V(a) | Decision

Case: The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
Situation: Situation in the Republic of Kenya

Filed during the Trial phase

Download

Document: English (398.6 KB | 10 Pages)


Related documents

10 September 2015, Ruto Defence application for extension of time limit to submit a ‘no case to answer’ motion (220.08 KB | 7 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1959 | Defence: Ruto

13 September 2015, Sang Defence Response to Ruto Defence application for extension of time limit to submit a ‘no case to answer’ motion (634.31 KB | 4 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1960 | Defence: Sang

13 September 2015, Prosecution’s consolidated response to the joint Defence request for extension of time limit to submit a “no case to answer” motion (142.23 KB | 6 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1962 | Office of the Prosecutor

14 September 2015, Sang Defence Second Request for Reconsideration of Page Limit (465.79 KB | 5 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1963 | Defence: Sang

15 September 2015, Ruto Defence Request to Join the “Sang Defence Second Request for Reconsideration of Page Limit” (449.21 KB | 4 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1964 | Defence: Ruto

15 September 2015, Prosecution’s response to Sang Defence second request for reconsideration of page limit (185.46 KB | 8 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1965 | Office of the Prosecutor

15 September 2015, Common Legal Representative for Victims’ Reply to the Ruto Defence Application for Extension of Time Limit to Submit a ‘no case to answer’ Motion (224.6 KB | 4 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1966 | Legal Representatives of Victims

6 November 2015, Scheduling Order for Oral Hearings on the Defence 'No Case to Answer' Motions (70.87 KB | 3 Pages)
ICC-01/09-01/11-1999 | Trial Chamber V(a)