Use one or more of the filters located in the left sidebar to narrow your search results

Document Type

Document Source

Phase of Case

Interlocutory Appeal

Court Records

Response to ‘Prosecution appeal of “Decision pursuant to article 18(2) of the Statute authorising the Prosecution to resume investigation” (ICC-02/17-196)’
Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan
  • Response
  • Other participants
  • ICC-02/17-204
Response to the appeal of the Prosecutor against the decision of Pre-Trail Chamber II entitled "Decision pursuant to article 18(2) of the Statute authorising the Prosecution to resume investigation" of 31 October 2022 (ICC-02/17-196)
Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan
  • Response
  • Other participants
  • ICC-02/17-203
Victims’ Response to “Prosecution appeal of “Decision pursuant to article 18(2) of the Statute authorising the Prosecution to resume investigation” (ICC-02/17-196)” (ICC-02/17-198)
Situation in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan
  • Response
  • Other participants
  • ICC-02/17-201
Prosecution Response to “Mémoire d’appel de trois décisions”
The Prosecutor v. Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman ("Ali Kushayb")
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-02/05-01/20-162
Corrected version of “Response to ‘Former child soldiers’ observations on the Appeal from the Second decision on the Defence’s challenge to the jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9’, ICC-01/04-02/06-1798”, 1 March 2017, ICC-01/04-02-181
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Defence: Ntaganda
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1810-Corr
Response to “Former child soldiers’ observations on the Appeal from the Second decision on the Defence’s challenge to the jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9”, ICC-01/04-02/06-1798
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Defence: Ntaganda
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1810
Prosecution Response to Mr Ntaganda’s request for leave to reply supporting his ‘Appeal from the Second Decision on the Defence’s Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9’ (ICC-01/04-02/06-1800)
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1804
Corrected version of “Prosecution’s Response to Ntaganda’s ‘Appeal from the Second Decision on the Defence’s Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9’”, 17 February 2017, ICC-01/04-02/06-1794
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1794-Corr
Prosecution’s Response to Ntaganda’s “Appeal from the Second Decision on the Defence’s Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9”??
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1794
Former Child Soldiers’ response to the “Application on behalf of Mr Ntaganda for variation of time limit for the filing of the document in support of the Appeal”
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Office of Public Counsel for Victims
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1735
Prosecution’s response to Mr Ntaganda’s application for variation of time limit for the filing of the document in support of the Appeal?
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1734
The Government of the Republic of Kenya’s Response to the ‘Amicus Curiae Observations of the Africa Centre for Open Governance pursuant to Rule 103 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence’
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • States Representatives
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1030
Victims’ response to the Amicus Curiae Observations of the Africa Centre for Open Governance
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • Legal Representatives of Victims
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1026
Prosecution response to the Government of Kenya’s request for extension of time to file its response to the “amicus curiae observations of the Africa Centre for Open Governance pursuant to Rule 103 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence”
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1027
Response of the Government of the Republic of Kenya to 'Corrected version of Victims' submissions on the Prosecutor's appeal against the "Decision on Prosecution's application for a finding of non-compliance under Article 87(7) of the Statute'
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • States Representatives
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1024
Response of the Government of the Republic of Kenya to ‘Victims’ request to participate in the Prosecutor’s appeal against the “Decision on Prosecution’s application for a finding of non‑compliance under Article 87 (7) of the Statute”
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • States Representatives
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1014
Response of the Government of the Republic of Kenya to 'Prosecution appeal against the "Decision on Prosecution's application for a finding of non-compliance under Article 87 (7) of the Statute"
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • States Representatives
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1013
Prosecution Response to Victims’ request to participate in the Prosecutor’s appeal against the “Decision on Prosecution’s application for a finding of non-compliance under Article 87(7) of the Statute”
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1012
Public redacted version of “Prosecution’s response to Mr Banda’s appeal against the decision issuing a warrant of arrest”, 23 January 2015, ICC-02/05-03/09-629-Conf-Exp
The Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-02/05-03/09-629-Red
Prosecution’s Response to “Defence Request for extension of time to submit Document in Support of Appeal”
The Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-02/05-03/09-622
About 53 results