Use one or more of the filters located in the left sidebar to narrow your search results

Document Type

Document Source

Phase of Case

Interlocutory Appeal

Court Records

Victims’ Response to the Defence Request for Suspensive Effect and to the Observations by the Trust Fund for Victims and Registry on the Request for Suspensive Effect
The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Response
  • ICC-02/04-01/15-2090
Defence Response to the Registry’s and TFV’s Submissions on Suspensive Effect and Rule 103 of the Rules and Procedure and Evidence
The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Response
  • Defence: Ongwen
  • ICC-02/04-01/15-2091
Victims’ Response to the Defence Request for Suspensive Effect in its appeal against the Reparations Order
The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Response
  • Office of Public Counsel for Victims
  • ICC-02/04-01/15-2089
Legal Representatives of Victims Joint Response to the “Defence request for a suspension of its notice of its intent to appeal Trial Chamber IX's Reparations Order pursuant to Rule 150(2) of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence"
The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Response
  • Office of Public Counsel for Victims
  • ICC-02/04-01/15-2078
Public Redacted Version of the “Response of the Common Legal Representative of the Victims of the Attacks to the ‘Defence Appellant Brief against the 14 July Addendum to the Reparations Order of 8 March 2021’ (No. ICC-01/04-02/06-2876-Conf)” (ICC-01/04-02
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Office of Public Counsel for Victims
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-2887-Red
Public Redacted Version of "Response on behalf of Mr Ntaganda to the Appeal Brief of the Common Legal Representative of the Victims of the Attacks against the “Addendum to the Reparations Order of 8 March 2021, ICC-01/04-02/06-2659”", ICC-01/04-02/06-2889
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Defence: Ntaganda
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-2889-Red
Public redacted version of the “Response of the Common Legal Representative of the Former Child Soldiers to the Defence Appeal Brief against the Addendum to the Reparations Order”, No. ICC-01/04-02/06-2888-Conf, dated 2 January 2024
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-2888-Red
Réponse de la Défense à la requête aux fins d’effet suspensif présentée par le Représentant légal commun des victimes des attaques et aux observations du Fonds au profit des victimes
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Defence: Ntaganda
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-2871-tFRA
Defence Response to the request for suspensive effect of the Common LegalRepresentative of the victims of the attacks and the observations of the Trust Fundfor Victims
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Defence: Ntaganda
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-2871
Response of the Common Legal Representative of the Former Child Soldiersto the request for suspensive effect of the Addendum to the Reparations Order introduced by the Defence (No. ICC-01/04-02/06-2864-Red)
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-2870
Response of the Common Legal Representative of the Victims of the Attacks to the “Request for the Defence appeal against the Addendum issued by Trial Chamber II on 14 July 2023 to be given suspensive effect” and the Trust Fund for Victims’ “Observati
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-2869
Lesser public redacted version of “Prosecution Response to ‘Defence Appeal Brief Against the Convictions in the Judgment of 4 February 2021’ (ICC-02/04-01/15-1866-Conf)”, 9 November 2021, ICC-02/04-01/15-1882-Red
The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-02/04-01/15-1882-Red2
Prosecution Response to Amicus Curiae observations by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Trafficking in Persons, especially women and children
The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-02/04-01/15-1967
Common Legal Representative of Victims’ Response to Amicus Curiae Observations No. ICC-02/04-01/15-1958 in the Defence’s Appeals against the Conviction and the Sentence
The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Response
  • Office of Public Counsel for Victims
  • ICC-02/04-01/15-1965
Defence Response to the UN Special Rapporteur Siobhán Mullally’s Amicus Curiae Observations
The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Response
  • Defence: Ongwen
  • ICC-02/04-01/15-1966
Corrected Version of “Defence Response to the Amici Curiae Observations”, filed on 17 January 2022 as ICC-02/04-01/15-1950
The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Response
  • Defence: Ongwen
  • ICC-02/04-01/15-1950-Corr
Defence Response to the Prosecution’s Motion to Strike, ICC-02/04-01/15-1959
The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Response
  • Defence: Ongwen
  • ICC-02/04-01/15-1961
CLRV Response to the Prosecution “Motion to Strike Paragraphs 51-52 of the ‘Defence Response to the Amici Curiae Observations’ (ICC-02/04-01/15-1950”
The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Response
  • Office of Public Counsel for Victims
  • ICC-02/04-01/15-1960
CLRV Response to the “Defence Correction to a Serious Error in the Common Legal Representative for Victims Observations on the Amici Curiae”
The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Response
  • Office of Public Counsel for Victims
  • ICC-02/04-01/15-1957
CLRV consolidated response to the Amici Curiae observations in the Defence’s Appeals against the Conviction and the Sentence
The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen
  • Response
  • Office of Public Counsel for Victims
  • ICC-02/04-01/15-1951
About 230 results