Use one or more of the filters located in the left sidebar to narrow your search results

Document Type

Document Source

Phase of Case

Interlocutory Appeal

Court Records

Corrected version of “Response to ‘Former child soldiers’ observations on the Appeal from the Second decision on the Defence’s challenge to the jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9’, ICC-01/04-02/06-1798”, 1 March 2017, ICC-01/04-02-181
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Defence: Ntaganda
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1810-Corr
Response to “Former child soldiers’ observations on the Appeal from the Second decision on the Defence’s challenge to the jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9”, ICC-01/04-02/06-1798
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Defence: Ntaganda
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1810
Prosecution Response to Mr Ntaganda’s request for leave to reply supporting his ‘Appeal from the Second Decision on the Defence’s Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9’ (ICC-01/04-02/06-1800)
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1804
Corrected version of “Prosecution’s Response to Ntaganda’s ‘Appeal from the Second Decision on the Defence’s Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9’”, 17 February 2017, ICC-01/04-02/06-1794
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1794-Corr
Prosecution’s Response to Ntaganda’s “Appeal from the Second Decision on the Defence’s Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court in respect of Counts 6 and 9”??
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1794
Former Child Soldiers’ response to the “Application on behalf of Mr Ntaganda for variation of time limit for the filing of the document in support of the Appeal”
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Office of Public Counsel for Victims
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1735
Prosecution’s response to Mr Ntaganda’s application for variation of time limit for the filing of the document in support of the Appeal?
The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/04-02/06-1734
The Government of the Republic of Kenya’s Response to the ‘Amicus Curiae Observations of the Africa Centre for Open Governance pursuant to Rule 103 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence’
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • States Representatives
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1030
Prosecution response to the Government of Kenya’s request for extension of time to file its response to the “amicus curiae observations of the Africa Centre for Open Governance pursuant to Rule 103 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence”
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1027
Victims’ response to the Amicus Curiae Observations of the Africa Centre for Open Governance
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • Legal Representatives of Victims
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1026
Response of the Government of the Republic of Kenya to 'Corrected version of Victims' submissions on the Prosecutor's appeal against the "Decision on Prosecution's application for a finding of non-compliance under Article 87(7) of the Statute'
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • States Representatives
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1024
Response of the Government of the Republic of Kenya to ‘Victims’ request to participate in the Prosecutor’s appeal against the “Decision on Prosecution’s application for a finding of non‑compliance under Article 87 (7) of the Statute”
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • States Representatives
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1014
Response of the Government of the Republic of Kenya to 'Prosecution appeal against the "Decision on Prosecution's application for a finding of non-compliance under Article 87 (7) of the Statute"
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • States Representatives
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1013
Prosecution Response to Victims’ request to participate in the Prosecutor’s appeal against the “Decision on Prosecution’s application for a finding of non-compliance under Article 87(7) of the Statute”
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-1012
Public redacted version of “Prosecution’s response to Mr Banda’s appeal against the decision issuing a warrant of arrest”, 23 January 2015, ICC-02/05-03/09-629-Conf-Exp
The Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-02/05-03/09-629-Red
Prosecution’s Response to “Defence Request for extension of time to submit Document in Support of Appeal”
The Prosecutor v. Abdallah Banda Abakaer Nourain
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-02/05-03/09-622
Réponse de la défense aux « Amicus Curiae Observations of Professors Robinson, deGuzman, Jalloh and Cryer » (ICC-02/11-01/11-534)
The Prosecutor v. Laurent Gbagbo
  • Response
  • Defence
  • ICC-02/11-01/11-540
Prosecution Response to the “Defence request for reconsideration of the ‘Decision on the request for suspensive effect’ and variation of time limits pursuant to Regulation 35 of the Regulations of the Court” (ICC-01/09-01/11-977)
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-987-Red
Prosecution Consolidated Response to additional requests for leave to submit amicus curiae observations in the Prosecution appeal against the “Decision on Mr. Ruto’s Request for Excusal from Continuous Presence at Trial”
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-979
Defence response to the requests from the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the Federal Republic of Nigeria for leave to submit amici curiae observations
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-976
About 27 results