Utilisez un ou plusieurs des filtres situés dans le menu latéral gauche pour affiner votre recherche

Type de document

Source du document

Phase de l’affaire

Appel interlocutoire (sélectionnez d'abord l’affaire)

Documents publics

Public redacted version of “Defence response to the Prosecution’s application pursuant to Regulation 35(2) for addition of documents to the list of evidence”, 18 September 2013, ICC-01/09-01/11-944-Conf
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Défense : Ruto
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-944-Red
Public redacted version of “Prosecution’s response to the Ruto Defence’s Bar Table Motion”, 4 April 2014, ICC-01/09-01/11-1254-Conf
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1254-Red
Prosecution response to “Defence Application for Leave to Reply to ‘Prosecution’s response to the Defence request to appoint an amicus prosecutor’”
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2033
Public redacted version of Prosecution’s response to the Defence requests to appoint an amicus prosecutor
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2031-Red
Sang Defence Response to ‘Ruto defence request to appoint an amicus prosecutor’ ??
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Défense : Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2030
Prosecution’s Response to the “Submission of material referred to by the Ruto Defence during the Status Conference on 14 January 2016”
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2020
Prosecution’s Response to the “Sang Defence’s Submission in addition to Appeal against the decision of Trial Chamber V (A) of 19 August entitled “Decision on Prosecution Request for Admission of Prior Recorded Testimony””
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2008
Second Public Redacted version of ‘Prosecution’s consolidated response to the “Corrigendum of Ruto Defence Request for Judgment of Acquittal” and “Sang Defence ‘No Case to Answer’ Motion”’, filed on 20 November 2015 (ICC-01/09-01/11-2000-Conf)
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2000-Red2
Public Redacted version of ‘Prosecution’s consolidated response to the “Corrigendum of Ruto Defence Request for Judgment of Acquittal” and “Sang Defence ‘No Case to Answer’ Motion”’, filed on 20 November 2015 (ICC-01/09-01/11-2000-Conf)
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2000-Red
Public Redacted Version of “Prosecution’s Consolidated Response to the Appeals of Mr Ruto and Mr Sang against the ‘Decision on Prosecution Request for Admission of Prior Recorded estimony’”, 26 October 2015, ICC-01/09-01/11-1994-Conf
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1994-Red
Sang Defence Response to the African Union’s Amicus Curiae Observations on the Rule 68 Amendments at the Twelfth Session of the Assembly of States Parties
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Défense : Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1993
Response of the Common Legal Representative for Victims to the Appeals by the Ruto Defence and Sang Defence Against the “Decision on Prosecution Request for Admission of Prior Recorded Testimony”
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Représentants légaux des victimes
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1995
Prosecution’s response to the African Union Commission’s amicus curiae submissions pursuant to rule 103
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1992
Defence response to “The Government of the Republic of Kenya’s Request for Leave pursuant to Rule 103(1) of the ICC Rules of Procedure and Evidence to join as Amicus Curiae and make Observations in the Appeal, by the Ruto and Sang Defence Teams, of the ‘
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Défense : Ruto
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1978
Sang Defence Response to the Government of the Republic of Kenya’s Request for Leave pursuant to Rule 103 (1) to join as Amicus Curiae and make Observations in the Appeal, by the Ruto and Sang Defence Teams, of the ‘Decision on Prosecution Request for
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Défense : Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1979
Prosecution’s Response to the Government of the Republic of Kenya’s Request to Participate as Amicus Curiae in the Appeal concerning the “Decision on Prosecution Request for Admission of Prior Recorded Testimony” (ICC-01/09-01/11-1972)
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1977
Prosecution’s response to Sang Defence second request for reconsideration of page limit
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1965
Prosecution’s consolidated response to the joint Defence request for extension of time limit to submit a “no case to answer” motion
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1962
Sang Defence Response to Ruto Defence application for extension of time limit to submit a ‘no case to answer’ motion
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Défense : Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1960
Prosecution’s Response to joint Defence request for extension of page and time limits
Le Procureur c. William Samoei Ruto et Joshua Arap Sang
  • Réponse
  • Bureau du Procureur
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1961
About 206 results