Use one or more of the filters located in the left sidebar to narrow your search results

Document Type

Document Source

Phase of Case

Interlocutory Appeal

Court Records

Public redacted version of “Defence response to the Prosecution’s application pursuant to Regulation 35(2) for addition of documents to the list of evidence”, 18 September 2013, ICC-01/09-01/11-944-Conf
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence: Ruto
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-944-Red
Public redacted version of “Prosecution’s response to the Ruto Defence’s Bar Table Motion”, 4 April 2014, ICC-01/09-01/11-1254-Conf
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1254-Red
Prosecution response to “Defence Application for Leave to Reply to ‘Prosecution’s response to the Defence request to appoint an amicus prosecutor’”
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2033
Public redacted version of Prosecution’s response to the Defence requests to appoint an amicus prosecutor
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2031-Red
Sang Defence Response to ‘Ruto defence request to appoint an amicus prosecutor’ ??
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2030
Prosecution’s Response to the “Submission of material referred to by the Ruto Defence during the Status Conference on 14 January 2016”
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2020
Prosecution’s Response to the “Sang Defence’s Submission in addition to Appeal against the decision of Trial Chamber V (A) of 19 August entitled “Decision on Prosecution Request for Admission of Prior Recorded Testimony””
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2008
Second Public Redacted version of ‘Prosecution’s consolidated response to the “Corrigendum of Ruto Defence Request for Judgment of Acquittal” and “Sang Defence ‘No Case to Answer’ Motion”’, filed on 20 November 2015 (ICC-01/09-01/11-2000-Conf)
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2000-Red2
Public Redacted version of ‘Prosecution’s consolidated response to the “Corrigendum of Ruto Defence Request for Judgment of Acquittal” and “Sang Defence ‘No Case to Answer’ Motion”’, filed on 20 November 2015 (ICC-01/09-01/11-2000-Conf)
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2000-Red
Public Redacted Version of “Prosecution’s Consolidated Response to the Appeals of Mr Ruto and Mr Sang against the ‘Decision on Prosecution Request for Admission of Prior Recorded estimony’”, 26 October 2015, ICC-01/09-01/11-1994-Conf
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1994-Red
Prosecution’s response to the African Union Commission’s amicus curiae submissions pursuant to rule 103
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1992
Sang Defence Response to the African Union’s Amicus Curiae Observations on the Rule 68 Amendments at the Twelfth Session of the Assembly of States Parties
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1993
Response of the Common Legal Representative for Victims to the Appeals by the Ruto Defence and Sang Defence Against the “Decision on Prosecution Request for Admission of Prior Recorded Testimony”
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Legal Representatives of Victims
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1995
Defence response to “The Government of the Republic of Kenya’s Request for Leave pursuant to Rule 103(1) of the ICC Rules of Procedure and Evidence to join as Amicus Curiae and make Observations in the Appeal, by the Ruto and Sang Defence Teams, of the ‘
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence: Ruto
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1978
Prosecution’s Response to the Government of the Republic of Kenya’s Request to Participate as Amicus Curiae in the Appeal concerning the “Decision on Prosecution Request for Admission of Prior Recorded Testimony” (ICC-01/09-01/11-1972)
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1977
Sang Defence Response to the Government of the Republic of Kenya’s Request for Leave pursuant to Rule 103 (1) to join as Amicus Curiae and make Observations in the Appeal, by the Ruto and Sang Defence Teams, of the ‘Decision on Prosecution Request for
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1979
Prosecution’s response to Sang Defence second request for reconsideration of page limit
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1965
Prosecution’s Response to joint Defence request for extension of page and time limits
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1961
Prosecution’s consolidated response to the joint Defence request for extension of time limit to submit a “no case to answer” motion
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1962
Sang Defence Response to Ruto Defence application for extension of time limit to submit a ‘no case to answer’ motion
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Response
  • Defence: Sang
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1960
About 206 results