Use one or more of the filters located in the left sidebar to narrow your search results

Document Type

Document Source

Phase of Case

Interlocutory Appeal

Court Records

Lesser redacted version of “Reply to the Prosecution’s Response to Paul Gicheru’s Written Submissions,” 18 May 2021, ICC-01/09-01/20-147-Conf
The Prosecutor v. Paul Gicheru
  • Reply
  • ICC-01/09-01/20-147-Red2
Public Redacted Version of "Reply to the Prosecution's Response to Paul Gicheru's Written Submissions," 18 May 2021
The Prosecutor v. Paul Gicheru
  • Reply
  • Defence: Gicheru
  • ICC-01/09-01/20-147-Red
Reply to the “Prosecution’s Response to OPCD’s ‘Appeal[] against the Decision on Applicability of Provisional Rule 165’”
The Prosecutor v. Paul Gicheru
  • Reply
  • Office of Public Counsel for Defence
  • ICC-01/09-01/20-94
Public Redacted Version of the Common Legal Representative for Victims’ Joint Reply to the “Ruto Defence Request for Judgment of Acquittal” and to the “Sang Defence ‘No Case to Answer’ Motion”
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Reply
  • Legal Representatives of Victims
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-2005-Red
Common Legal Representative for Victims’ Reply to the Ruto Defence Application for Extension of Time Limit to Submit a ‘no case to answer’ Motion
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Reply
  • Legal Representatives of Victims
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1966
Common Legal Representative for Victims’ Reply to the Sang Defence Response to Ruto Defence Application for Extension of Time Limit to Submit a ‘no case to answer’ Motion
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Reply
  • Legal Representatives of Victims
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1967
Victims’ reply to the ‘Defence response to Victims’ request for reclassification’
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Reply
  • Legal Representatives of Victims
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-980
Public redacted version of “Prosecution’s Reply to the “Defence Response to Corrected version of ‘Prosecution’s eighth application pursuant to Regulation 35(2) of the Regulations of the Court’”, 21 August 2014, ICC-01/09-01/11-1463””
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Reply
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1471-Red
Public redacted version of Prosecution reply to the Ruto Defence’s 8 January 2014 and the Sang Defence’s 8 January 2014 responses to the Prosecution’s request under article 64(6)(b) and article 93 to summon witnesses and variation of time limits
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Reply
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1183-Red
Prosecution reply to the Government of Kenya’s 20 December 2013 observations
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Reply
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-894
Prosecution’s Reply to the “Sang Defence Response to Prosecution Application pursuant to Regulation 35 (2) for Addition of Documents to the List of Evidence”
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Reply
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-1002
Reply by the Government of Kenya to the ''Prosecution response to the'Government of Kenya's Submissions on the Status of Cooperation with the International Criminal Court, or, in the alternative. Application for Leave to file Observations pursuant to
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Reply
  • States Representatives
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-769
Reply by the Government of Kenya to the "Prosecution response to the 'Government of Kenya's Submissions on the Status of Cooperation with the International Criminal Court, or, in the alternative. Application for Leave to file Observations pursuant to Rul
The Prosecutor v. Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Reply
  • Other participants
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-755
Public Redacted Version of "Defence Reply to Confidential redacted version of the 25 February 2013 Consolidated Prosecution response to the Defence applications under Article 64 of the Statue to refer the confirmation decision back to the Pre-Trial Chamb
The Prosecutor v. Francis Kirimi Muthaura and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Reply
  • Defence
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-678-Red
Public Redacted Version of the Defence Reply to the "Confidential redacted version of the 25 February 2013 Consolidated Prosecution Response to the Defence applications under Article 64 of the Statute to refer the confirmation decision back to the Pre-Tr
The Prosecutor v. Francis Kirimi Muthaura and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Reply
  • Defence
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-681-Red
Prosecution’s Reply to the “Defence’s Response to the “Prosecution’s Submission of the Charges against Francis Kirimi Muthaura and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta pursuant to Trial Chamber V’s Order ICC-01/09-02/11-536””
The Prosecutor v. Francis Kirimi Muthaura and Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta
  • Reply
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-575
Prosecution’s Reply to the Defence Responses to the Prosecution’s Submission of the Charges
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Reply
  • Office of the Prosecutor
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-514
Reply on behalf of the Government of Kenya to the Responses of the Prosecutor, Defence, and OPCV to the Government’s Application pursuant to Article 19 of the Rome Statute
The Prosecutor v. Francis Kirimi Muthaura, Uhuru Muigai Kenyatta and Mohammed Hussein Ali
  • Reply
  • States Representatives
  • ICC-01/09-02/11-91
Reply on behalf of the Government of Kenya to the Responses of the Prosecutor, Defence, and OPCV to the Government’s Application pursuant to Article 19 of the Rome Statute
The Prosecutor v. William Samoei Ruto, Henry Kiprono Kosgey and Joshua Arap Sang
  • Reply
  • States Representatives
  • ICC-01/09-01/11-89
Reply by Professors Max Hilaire & William A. Cohn to Victim's Response to the Request to Appear as Amicus Curiae
Situation in the Republic of Kenya
  • Reply
  • Other participants
  • ICC-01/09-12
About 20 results